WebApr 21, 2008 · In a well established Washington State Supreme Court decision from March 1969 (Gostovich v. City of West Richland), the court wrote that “The test as to the materiality of a variance is whether it gives a bidder a substantial advantage or benefit not enjoyed by other bidders.” WebGostovich v. West Richland, 75 Wn.2d 583, 452 P.2d 737 (1969). In the case at bar the omitted signature can only be considered to be a material defect. The bid was not …

DICK ENTERPRISES v. METRO 922 P.2d 184 (1996) - Leagle

WebFeb 3, 1978 · The issues raised are (1) did the trial court lack jurisdiction to review the actions of the defendant; (2) was the school district bound by the provisions of RCW 28A.58.135; (3) was the school district's right to reject any and all bids absolute; and (4) was the school district's action in rejecting the plaintiff's low bid arbitrary and … WebMar. 1969] GOSTOVICH v. WEST RICHLAND 587. The trial court allowed $30 a day damages for the period from September 18 to and including October 12 (the date of the … rightmove da16 houses

GOSTOVICH v. CITY OF WEST RICHLAND - Leagle

WebOpinion for Platt Electric v. Seattle, 555 P.2d 421, 16 Wash. App. 265 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. ... Gostovich v. West Richland, 75 Wash. 2d 583, 587, … WebGostovich v. West Richland, 75 Wash. 2d 583, 452 P.2d 737 (1969). In the case at bar the omitted signature can only be considered to be a material defect. The bid was not binding on the plaintiff until properly signed by its corporate officers. If the contract had been awarded to plaintiff, plaintiff would thereby have been in a position of ... WebGostovich V West Richland. Gostovich was the low bidder at the bid opening, but another company who had a lower bid mailed in the bid. The mailed bid did not arrive on time, but because it was stamped for before the opening it counted. Gostovich lost the job. Harry Pepper V Cape Coral. rightmove darlington houses for sale